Stephen Horn Reports
News • Politics • Writing
Bernstein v. Sims: Election Integrity Advocate Sues after Banishment from Wake County BoE Headquarters
November 11, 2022
post photo preview
Bernstein was trespassed from the Wake County Board of Elections Operations Center at 1200 N New Hope Road

UPDATE: The judge has granted a preliminary injunction allowing Ms. Bernstein to attend public meetings at the facility

On May 14th, 2022, three days before the North Carolina primary, election integrity advocate Lynn Bernstein was "trespassed" from the Wake County Board of Elections Headquarters. Bernstein is currently bringing a federal lawsuit against the Board and the county Director of Elections, alleging that her constitutional rights have been violated by the prohibition against setting foot on the property, which is open to the public for occasions such as Board meetings and observation of certain counting/recounting procedures (case: Bernstein v. Sims (5:22-cv-00277)).

Bernstein has a hearing on a preliminary injunction next Monday (November 14th). There hasn't been much if any media coverage of the incident, so I figured I'd write something up after an analysis of the motions and evidence filed by both parties in the case. Since I'm not a lawyer, I'll be focusing on the facts alleged as opposed to the legal claims made.

Background

Lynn Bernstein got into election integrity after the 2016 election, utilizing her experience testing complex systems in Aerospace Engineering to examine North Carolina election systems, laws, practices, et cetera. Prior to 2020, local mainstream media had actually covered Bernstein's election integrity efforts favorably, such as in an ABC11 article titled "Cary mom helps convince Board of Elections to reconsider vote on voting machines". In 2019, Bernstein founded Transparent Elections NC, a "non-partisan group of volunteers who are making elections more trustworthy in NC by working with elections officials to ensure that elections are transparent, secure, robustly audited, and publicly verified". Bernstein is a Democrat, as can be verified by her voter registration, or her presence as a Board Member for the Democratic Women of Wake County.

May 14th, 2022

The following facts are not in dispute: three days before North Carolina's 2022 primary election night, Bernstein and John Brakey, co-founder and directory of AUDIT USA, travelled to the Wake County Board of Elections property to scope out a location for an election night protest to call for greater transparency from the Board. A private "Special Police" officer Janice Carter working security for the Board observed Bernstein and Brakey driving around the property before parking at a nearby lot, and recognized Bernstein from previously visits to the Board. Carter then contacted Gary Sims, the Wake County Director of Elections because she was aware of "prior incidents" "involving" Bernstein, and met Sims outside the building in view of Bernstein and Brakey. Carter then called the Raleigh Police to report a "suspicious vehicle". Although Carter does not specify in her declaration that the call was made at the direction of Sims, in the call to the police she stated that "the director asked me to call and state that it's a suspicious  activity."

Bernstein and Brakey moved around the outside of the property, looking for a good location to hold their planned protest. The pair also approached an open gate, out of view of where Carter and Sims were watching. We'll get into what happened at the gate below, as the exact facts are in dispute. After Sims received a call from his Deputy Directory Olivia McCall about the gate incident, Carter called Raleigh Police again to expedite the response to her first call.

When the Raleigh Police Officer arrived, he informed Bernstein and Brakey had already left the property. The officer informed them that they were being trespassed. For those who aren't aware, this does not mean they were arrested, or charged with any crime. Instead, they were informed that they would be arrested in the future if either returned to the property

Facts in Dispute: the Gate Incident

Bernstein and Brakey had approached an open gate to a parking lot on the North West side of the building. According to Bernstein, Brakey took a few steps inside the gate "get a better look" at some signs which had been set up inside the fence. As soon as Brakey stepped inside the gate, it began to close. Brakey rejoined Bernstein outside the automated gate, which proceeded to open and close multiple times.

The defendants have a different description of this incident, alleging that Bernstein was "tampering" with the gate, and that this was the basis for the trespass from the property. There is also the third-hand allegation in Carter's declaration that McCall told Sims that "a person or persons were seen on camera by the Wake County Security Officer using their foot to activate the sensor to the gate in an effort to prevent the Wake County Security officer from closing the gate". McCall's declaration does not include any mention of a foot, instead stating that "the security officer informed me that there were two individuals positioned near the gate and one individual was preventing the gate from closing properly." The report filed by the security officer in question, Caleb Sparks, claims that "console attempted to close the gate but there were a [sic] two individuals (an older male and female) who walked through the gate and kept it from closing (Can be viewed on 5710F BOW EX NW Main Parking 2). These individuals proceeded to walk through the gate and onto BOE property several more times, preventing the gate from closing."

The video of the incident captured by the security camera which Sparks references does not appear to have been included in the case. In reference to Sparks' report, Bernstein's Amdended Complaint alleges that "the report also refers to two different County surveillance videos, videos that were not provided to Ms. Bernstein even after multiple requests. County surveillance video provided to Ms. Bernstein clearly shows that she never entered the gate." It seems to me that this video of the incident would clearly demonstrate which version of the story is more accurate, and whether the Board has any real evidence that Bernstein or Brakey was in fact attempting to tamper with the gate. It would also clear up whether the plaintiff, Bernstein, actually ever set foot inside the gate (even the declarations filed by the Board are not consistent in this regard).

"Prior Incidents"

As we can note in both the declarations of Carter and McCall, Bernstein was known to them by both name and face. In McCall's declaration, she states that she "personally witnessed [Bernstein] exhibit behavior at the WCBOE that has necessitated elevated security measures." As documented in an attached email regarding a board meeting on October 5th, 2021, the "behavior" in question was Bernstein leaving her bag in the Board Meeting room after the meeting ended. In addition, Bernstein is alleged to have waited outside in the parking lot to ask Board Members questions on camera as they exited. The "elevated security measures" in question appear to be that the Board Members started parking in a private lot so they could "enter and exit without being approached by members of the public."

Bernstein's filings contain a description of a different sort of "prior incident" at the same October 5th board meeting, where Sims approached Bernstein, leaned in to "within a millimeter of [Bernstein's] nose, and quietly seethed 'Get Out,'" according to an included affidavit by Karen Raines. Raines also attested that she was "stunned by the menacing manner in which [Sims] spoke to Lynn [Bernstein]."

Conclusion

That's my analysis of the facts alleged by both sides in this case as they currently stand. On the one hand, Bernstein alleges that the trespass/ban is targeted harassment as a response to her 100% legal behavior in consistently addressing the board and attempting to hold them accountable for what she perceives to be a lack of transparency. On the other hand, the Board alleges that it was solely Bernstein's behavior which contributed to the ban, without any regard for the content of her speech.

I'll try to keep y'all updated as this case continues to progress.

Document links:
1 Original Complaint
13 Motion for Preliminary Injunction
14 Memo in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
16 Answer to Complaint
17 Motion to Dismiss (Failure to State a Claim)
18 Memo in Support of Motion to Dismiss
20 Response in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction
21 Amended Complaint
22 Response in Opposition to Motion for Dismiss
23 Reply in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
23 Reply in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction Exhibit A
23 Reply in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction Exhibit B
23 Reply in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction Exhibit C

I have photographic, audio, and video exhibits as well, but I'm not sure the best way to make them available. There's links in a document published by Bernstein, as well as a press release.

community logo
Join the Stephen Horn Reports Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
1
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
BREAKING: Investigation in NC reveals more evidence of ActBlue-related political contribution laundering

Inspired by O'Keefe Media Group's reporting, I found two Raleigh citizens whose names were fraudulently used on $20,000+ of political contributions they did not make in a two year period (2021-2022)

We also found two instances in Durham and Chapel Hill where the donors did not live at the reported address at the date of the reported donation

For more details: https://actbluefraudnc.com

00:02:49
EXCLUSIVE: Bodycam video shows Raleigh Police crackdown on 1st Reopen NC protest (04/14/2020)

BREAKING: Exclusively obtained bodycam video shows behind-the-scenes of the police action against the first Reopen NC protest back in April of 2020

Raleigh Police would infamously declare that "protesting is a non-essential activity" when questioned by the public about the event

00:10:35
VIDEO: How Did the QAnon Shaman Make It into the Capitol?

Last night, Tucker Carlson highlighted how Jacob Chansley aka the QAnon Shaman was treated by the police inside the Capitol.

What I have been researching and putting together since 2021 is how the police defense on the West Side of the Capitol failed, allowing rioters to breach the unguarded Senate Wing Door and people like Jacob Chansley to "peacefully" or nonviolently enter the Capitol with no police present to stop or warn them.

On January 6th, the police response was inconsistent and poorly coordinated. That's why you could have police outside setting people on fire with flashbangs and police inside escorting Jacob Chansley around.

I'm working to get a documentary out soon explaining the series of events from the perimeter of Capitol Grounds which led to the complete collapse of the Capitol defenses and the first breach of the Capitol Building at the Senate Wing Door.

The video below is a brief summary, but if y'all want to be notified when the documentary goes live, follow me ...

00:00:58
September 08, 2023
J6 Documentary Released - 79 Minutes: Breach of the Capitol

At long last, the documentary I have been working on related to January 6th is live!

79 Minutes: Breach of the Capitol follows the timeline and sequence of events on January 6th between the initial violence at the edge of Capitol Grounds to the breach of the Capitol Building

Y'all can watch the full documentary for free:

placeholder
In the News - "Exposed: Investigation indicates ActBlue potentially ‘laundered’ fraudulent political donations" (Carolina Journal)

Carolina Journal political reporter Alex Baltzegar has a write-up on our investigation into political contribution laundering related to the ActBlue Democratic fundraising platform:
https://www.carolinajournal.com/exposed-investigation-indicates-actblue-potentially-laundered-fraudulent-political-donations/

In the News: "J6 Journalist Headed to Trial in Landmark Press Freedom Case"

I spoke with journalist Ken Silva for this article on my reporting as an independent journalist on January 6th, and the subsequent misdemeanor charges the DOJ brought against me:

"Horn provided examples of his earlier work, as well as reference letters, emails and other records supporting his claim to being a legitimate journalist—and not the pro-Trump activist that government has portrayed him as..."

https://headlineusa.com/exclusive-j6-journalist-press-freedom-case/

post photo preview
Court Documents Reveal Identity of Officer Who Shoved Trump Supporter Off Staircase

On January 6th, Derrick Vargo was severely injured when he was pushed off a ledge on the West side of the Capitol. Vargo was climbing up the outside of the railing with a flag as Capitol Police officers attempted to hold the landing mid-way up the North West staircase. Video shows Vargo turning around to retreat just before a Capitol Police officer in a blue motorcycle helmet and a black mask reaches out and pushes Vargo off the staircase. Vargo was carried off from the scene unresponsive.

Court documents released last month reveal the identity of the masked Capitol Police Officer as Bryant Williams. Although many of these facts were brought to my attention by a confidential source, they are verifiable via publicly available material. I am sharing this information because I believe in accountability.

United States v. RAMEY

Officer Williams was named as a victim in the government's case against Barry Bennet Ramey. Ramey was accused of spraying two officers including Williams with a chemical agent. Although Ramey was found guilty of charges including obstruction and violence, he was found not guilty of using a "deadly or dangerous weapon" in the commission of those crimes. Besides Officer Williams' testimony in the case describing his location and appearance, we also have a labeled screenshot from the government's post-trial brief:

From the United States's Post-Trial Brief, p.6

Following the Trail

Officer Williams is first seen at the foot of this staircase around 1:00 pm, shortly after rioters had overrun the police line at the perimeter of Capitol Grounds.

Still from video published by ABQ RAW showing Officer Williams at the foot of the NW staircase ~1 pm [1]

1:00 - 1:48 pm - foot of the NW staircase

As reinforcements arrive, the Capitol Police are able to re-stabilize a line across the lower plaza, between the two massive staircases leading up to the West Terrace. On January 6th, the staircases had been covered with scaffolding in preparation for the inauguration. Although there were officers like Williams guarding the entrance to the North West staircase, they were somewhat cut off from the more heavily armored officers in riot gear to the South, across the plaza, and to the North, across the lawn.

During this period, between 1:00 pm and 1:48 pm, the police are actually able to slowly push their line forward. They also begin deploying flashbangs into the crowd at approximately 1:20 pm (including setting a man on fire and all that fun stuff).

1:48 pm - foot of the NW staircase

Although the police have been able to more than hold their own on this side of the Capitol for nearly an hour, an incident at 1:48 pm involving Officer Williams is going to turn the tide against them. This is the first of a series of events on the North West staircase which will end up with the police abandoning the staircase, allowing rioters to outflank the main police line and breach undefended entrances like the Senate Wing Door, which will be the first entry into the actual Capitol Building.

The incident appears to start with an unidentified man in a grey hoodie referred to as "#lemongrey" by the "Sedition Hunters". As far as I can tell from the video, it is Officer Williams who initiates the scuffle by shoving #lemongrey as he turns to walk away. However, it quickly turns into a general assault and the police retreat up the staircase. Ramey was found guilty of assault for his use of a chemical spray at this time.

From the United States's Post-Trial Brief, p.6

1:48 pm - 2:02 pm - returning to duty on the NW staircase

According to Officer Williams' testimony in the Ramey trial, he was incapacitated by the chemical spray, and even collapsed due to the burning in his face. Before he had a chance to receive decontamination, he headed back over to defend the NW staircase (referred to as the "Senate stairs"). Williams also testified that "everything started getting kind of blurry", and that he is still suffering vision impairment from the incident.

Screenshots from Young Kim/RMG NEWS show Williams on the landing of the NW staircase

14:02 pm - Derrick Vargo

The police have retreated up to a landing on the middle of the staircase, and are attempting to hold the line. At this point, one Trump supporter named Derrick Vargo begins climbing up the outside of the railing on the staircase. According to Vargo, he just wanted to hang his flag up where people could see it (take that with as many grains of salt as you feel appropriate.) After officers attempt to strike, spray, and grab Vargo, he turns around and begins heading back towards the bottom of the staircase. Just then, the video shows Officer Williams stepping forward and pushing Vargo off the staircase. I encourage anyone interested to watch as many angles of video as they can before coming to their own conclusion.

screenshot from security camera

The aftermath

When Vargo hits the ground, there is an immediate reaction in the crowd below, as many witnessed the incident and believe the police officer is responsible. Shortly after Vargo is carried off on a bicycle rack used as an improvised stretcher, members of the crowd below the staircase begin throwing objects at the police on the landing. Under assault from two directions, these police retreat.

Although the police do briefly attempt to hold a line of fencing at the top of the staircase, they quickly scatter, giving the rioters unimpeded access to the West Terrace. Some quickly make their way over to the Senate Wing Door and break in through the windows, marking the first breach into the Capitol Building on January 6th.

One of the facts I find astonishing is that, despite the presence of Deputy Chief Eric Waldow on this staircase during this critical 20+ minute period, none of the heavily armored police on the plaza below appear to be sent to reinforce the beleaguered police on the NW staircase. Instead, the unit of armored Metropolitan Police which arrives during this period marches right past the foot of the staircase to join the main police line on the plaza.

For questions, comments, or correction, I am available for contact via Twitter or email

[1]

Read full Article
post photo preview
CONFIRMED: Undercover MPD Employee(s) Acted as Agent Provocateurs on January 6th

Since January 6th, many citizens have wondered if any of the numerous unarrested individuals caught on camera were federal agents/informants. I've been particularly curious about the Metropolitan Police "Undercover Employees" (MPD UCE) in the crowd. The first admission I'd seen by the federal government that any sort of undercover agents were present was in a criminal complaint filed against Fi Duong in June of 2021. Now, those specific undercover employees are back in the spotlight with a viral Twitter thread by another J6 defendant, William Pope. Pope included descriptions of several scenes from a video in which MPD UCEs join in crowd chants and encourage people to move towards the Capitol. In reviewing material for my own J6 case, I have been able to watch the video in question, and can confirm that Pope's claims regarding the MPD UCEs' actions/statements are largely accurate.

Undercover MPD referenced as "Officer 2" and "Officer 3" in the Pope Filing (source)

United States v. DUONG

On the morning of January 6th, a Virginia man named Fi Duong met an Metropolitan Police Undercover Employee near the Freedom Plaza in Washington D.C. Duong must have exchanged contact information with the MPD UCE, as he used the opportunity to introduce Duong to an undercover FBI agent. The FBI agent proceeded to inflitrate a sort of "gun club" which Duong was a member of. The agent was not able to entice Duong himself into any criminal activity (Duong was only charged with J6 related offenses), but the agent was able get another member of the group, Adam MacLaury, charged with firearm related offenses. However, the focus of this article is the actions of the MPD UCE referenced in these two paragraphs:

Excerpt from the Criminal Complaint/Statement of Facts against Fi Duong

 

MPD "Electronic Surveillance Unit"

As reported by Patricia Tolson in The Epoch Times, the Metropolitan Police Department had undercover/plainclothes employees in the crowd on January 6th to “document the actions of the demonstrators and MPD’s response to any civil disobedience or criminal activity.” It is my understanding that the video referenced in the Pope filing is one of the videos recorded by the Electronic Surveillance Unit, and kept as "sensitive" material in the January 6th evidence archive provided to defendants as Brady material. The video cannot currently be made public, as defendants are required to sign a protective order preventing certain "sensitive" or "highly sensitive" material from being disclosed.

The Pope Filing

In November 2022, William Pope included the following claims as part of a motion to compel the government to give him more access to discovery:

Below is an abbreviated description of the conversations and actions depicted in this undercover officer’s footage:
 
As three undercover MPD officers approach the NW corner of the Capitol groundsaround approximately 1:40 p.m., Officer 1 (filming) joins the crowd in chanting “drain the swamp.Near the NW walkway the three undercover officers see men running towards the Capitol. Officer 2, who is wearing black overalls, a black hoodie, a black bandana, and a red Trump beanie, remarks, “those guys are getting shot.” Shortly after this, Officer 2 says, “I’m going to follow this from a distance.As they walk forward, Officer 2 says, this is amazing!Officer 1 responds, Yeah, I’ve never seen anything like this.” Officer 2 then changes their direction and the three undercover officers head towards the Northwest Scaffolding. Near the scaffolding a man asks them, “is Trump still walking here?” Officer 2 remarks, “honestly I don’t think he can walk that far, let’s be honest, he’s long winded though that’s for sure.”
 
When protestors reach the top of the stairs and scaffolding, the three undercover officers move forward. Officer 3, a clean shaven white male who is wearing a blue jacket and grey beanie, yells “holy shit!” Officer 2 then reiterates his belief that someone will get shot. With awink and a nudge, Officer 3 asks Officer 2 if he wants to go up there too. Officer 2 smiles andsays, “I’ll be honest with you, kinda.” Officer 1 says “yeah” and taps them to move forward as Officer 2 laughs about it. When Officer 1 asks the other officers which way they want to go,Officer 2 suggests going up the stairs with protestors. Near the base of the stairs Officer 1 joins the crowd in chanting Whose house? Our house!
 
Officer 1 begins yelling at people in front of him to “Go, go, go!” As they climb bicycle racks, Officer 1 yells for the crowd to help him up, help him up! followed by “push him up, push him up!” Officer 1 also pushes others in front of him to get them to advance on the Capitol, and he yells “cmon, cmon, cmon, let’s go!” as those around him climb the bike racks and scaffolding. Needing help to get up, Officer 1 asks a nearby man to give him a boost. The man gives Officer 1 a lift up, and Offer 1 says “thanks bro.” As Officer 1 advances up the stairs, he continues to urge the crowd onward, yelling “cmon, go, go, go!,” followed shortly by “keep going, keep going!” These phrases are repeated as the undercover officer moves forward with the crowd. At one point, Officer 1 encounters a woman trying to go back down the steps and he discourages her from attempting it. Near the middle of the steps, Officer 1 encounters a man he recognizes wearing a blue jacket and what appears to be swim goggles and a white gargoyle mask with gold teeth. Officer 1 greets the manas “Tim,” and the plain clothes Tim responds, “what’s going on bro?”
 
This video clearly evidences undercover law enforcement officers urging the crowds to advance up the stairs and scaffolding towards the Capitol on January 6. The government may claim that incidents like this did not happen, but the facts show they did. Since the government cannot be trusted to disclose these facts, it becomes even more important that defense teams, including Pro Se defendants, be able to directly examine the evidence.

Although I have reviewed the full video which Pope is referencing, I will refrain from an in depth fact check or contextualization of each quote, since I am unclear whether that would be a violation of the protective order I have signed. I will note two "corrections":

  1. As the Epoch Times article notes, I'm not sure whether the members of the "Electronic Surveillance Unit" are techinically officers. The individual who encountered Fi Duong is referred to as an "Metropolitan Police Department Undercover Employees" in the Duong and MacLaury filings.
  2. I have been able to confirm that the individual referred to as "Tim" in the Pope filing is in fact J6 defendant Fi Duong, not another undercover agent

Conclusion

I believe the video referenced by Pope constitutes perhaps more real and confirmed evidence of federal agents/employees acting as "agent provocateur" than any other claims of the sort which have been made since January 6th, including Ray Epps. Unfortunately, we still seem to be a long ways from the public or even members of the media being able to review the evidence to determine what role the actions of the undercover government actors had in how January 6th played out.

Read full Article
post photo preview
NC GOP Sued over Convention E-Voting Debacle

Three delegates from the North Carolina Republican Party (NC GOP) convention in Greensboro last month have filed a lawsuit against the party over the electronic voting process/procedure.

The allegations in the lawsuit follow the same lines as the complaints I previously wrote on, centering around two issues: the failure to ensure that only delegates physically present on the floor could vote, and the failure to conduct an election for vice-chair of the party.

The plaintiffs are asking for the Wake Superior Court to declare that the NC GOP violated it's rules and order the party to conduct a special election.

The App

The rules for the convention stated that "delegates casting vote must be on the floor of the Convention at the time such vote is cast", but the custom app used for voting at the convention did not enforce this rule. The affidavits attached to the lawsuit contain evidence that both delegates and non-delegates were able to cast illegitimate votes using the app:

  • Alison Dunlap: a guest, who was able to use the app to vote from off the convention floor
  • Courtney Geels: delegate from Durham County, aware of votes cast from Wisconsin and Wilmington
  • Jay DeLancy: a guest, after seeing a delegate who was locked out after leaving the floor to use the restroom, DeLancy encouraged him to successfully use the app to vote from off the floor

As I noted previously, all these examples appear to be individuals whose purpose was to prove the flaws in the voting process.

There was an additional layer of security not mentioned in the lawsuit: the app required log-in credentials which were provided to delegates when they registered to the convention. I didn't see anything in the affidavits about how the non-delegate(s) who voted were able to bypass this security precaution.

Vice-chair election

The lawsuit also takes major issue with the lack of election for the vice-chair position. When the election for party chair went long, it was announced that there was not a quorum sufficient to continue with the vote for vice-chair and the session was adjourned. After the convention the challenger for vice-chair, Addul Ali, withdrew his candidacy, and it was decided that the incumbent Susan Mills was would continue for another 2-year term without an election.

The plaintiffs take issue with this appointment, alleging that it is a violation of the "Party's Plan of Organization and the State Convention Rules".


The full complaint and associated documents can be found on the e-Courts system: link.

The plaintiffs are represented by James R. Lawrence III and Adam Banks of Envisage Law.

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals