Stephen Horn Reports
News • Politics • Writing
Delegates complain of e-voting at NC GOP Convention
"It's a sham, and we're not going to put up with it" - John Kane, NC GOP chairman candidate
June 27, 2023

Although election integrity is listed as a "critical issue" on the NC GOP's website, the party's convention in Greensboro earlier this month was marred by numerous complaints by delegates of issues and irregularities with the electronic voting process at the convention, including a custom app designed for the convention by the political consulting firm Cardinal GPS. In addition, the election process for the chairman's race was so delayed that the votes for vice-chair and party platform could not take place.

John Kane, the "grassroots" candidate challenging incumbent chairman Michael Whatley, has refused to concede, referring to the election process as "fake" and a "sham" to his supporters on the night of the vote.

placeholder

In a letter to Chairman Whatley the following Wednesday, Kane cited irregularities and concerns with the election process used at the convention:

1. Votes Cast from Out of State - Votes were cast from Wisconsin and Florida, a direct violation of the rules requiring a Delegate to be present on the floor of the convention to cast a vote.
2. Non-Delegates Cast Votes - Convention Guests voting from the lobby of the convention.
3. Over-Votes - Over-votes from multiple counties.
4. Under-Votes - Under-votes from multiple counties (approx. 52).
5. Voter Suppression - Delegates who did not vote because they had to excuse themselves to use the restroom and were barred from re-entering the convention floor.

1. No Paper Trail - The voting app and electronic kiosks have no paper audit trails that can be manually counted by "bi-partisan" teams to verify the electronic results.
2. No Voter Verification - County delegates have not been afforded the opportunity to verify the list of credentialed delegates in their County.
3. No Reconciliation - No accounting of the number of credentialed delegates in each County and the number of votes cast by County. Further, Final delegate count The number of delegates who registered and checked in at the State Convention in Greensboro has not yet been revealed.
4. No Logic and Accuracy Testing - No disclosure of an L&A test; if one was conducted there has been no transparency as to who devised the L&A test, who conducted the test, and who provided oversight of the test.
5. No Secret Ballots - You, your staff, and the voting app developer all have complete and unfettered access to how each delegate cast their vote; yet, each voter has no way to be certain that their vote was counted for the candidate for whom they voted.

Kane's letter summarizes election integrity concerns with the electronic voting process which had been publicized before the election occurred; but attempts at the convention to switch to a paper ballot process were unsuccessful. The vote ultimately took place using both kiosks at the convention as well as the as through the convention app.

As far as I can tell, based on conversation with disgruntled delegates, the votes being cast from locations the convention floor from as far away as Florida or Wisconsin were due to delegates attempting to demonstrate that the electronic voting process was lacking important safeguards.

Skepticism of an election process often goes hand-in-hand with skepticism of the result, but even the Kane supporting delegates I spoke to did not necessarily go as far as to claim that the 60-40 result in favor of Whatley would have gone the other way with a more secure and confidence-inducing process.

Although at least two of the delegates I spoke with told me they were assured the app was using geolocation or other technology to prevent offsite voting, I confirmed with a member of the Granville County GOP executive committee that a Granville County delegate was able to successfully vote using the app from Creedmoor, over 60 miles from Greensboro where the convention was taking place. The Granville GOP issued a letter after the convention, referring to the election process as a "debacle" and calling on the NC GOP and Chairman Whatley to take responsibility and ensure that the issues "never, ever happen again".

The app in question was developed by Cardinal GPS, a "full-service political consulting and fundraising firm" located outside of Raleigh, NC which boasts experience in "national organizations, working on Capitol Hill, statewide grassroots operations, legal/compliance, media, and digital advertising". Public records show that the organization has received hundreds of thousands of dollars in payments from Republican campaigns and county parties in North Carolina since 2021.

The NC GOP, Cardinal GPS, and John Kane were all reached out to before publication of this article, but did not choose to comment.

community logo
Join the Stephen Horn Reports Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
BREAKING: Investigation in NC reveals more evidence of ActBlue-related political contribution laundering

Inspired by O'Keefe Media Group's reporting, I found two Raleigh citizens whose names were fraudulently used on $20,000+ of political contributions they did not make in a two year period (2021-2022)

We also found two instances in Durham and Chapel Hill where the donors did not live at the reported address at the date of the reported donation

For more details: https://actbluefraudnc.com

00:02:49
EXCLUSIVE: Bodycam video shows Raleigh Police crackdown on 1st Reopen NC protest (04/14/2020)

BREAKING: Exclusively obtained bodycam video shows behind-the-scenes of the police action against the first Reopen NC protest back in April of 2020

Raleigh Police would infamously declare that "protesting is a non-essential activity" when questioned by the public about the event

00:10:35
VIDEO: How Did the QAnon Shaman Make It into the Capitol?

Last night, Tucker Carlson highlighted how Jacob Chansley aka the QAnon Shaman was treated by the police inside the Capitol.

What I have been researching and putting together since 2021 is how the police defense on the West Side of the Capitol failed, allowing rioters to breach the unguarded Senate Wing Door and people like Jacob Chansley to "peacefully" or nonviolently enter the Capitol with no police present to stop or warn them.

On January 6th, the police response was inconsistent and poorly coordinated. That's why you could have police outside setting people on fire with flashbangs and police inside escorting Jacob Chansley around.

I'm working to get a documentary out soon explaining the series of events from the perimeter of Capitol Grounds which led to the complete collapse of the Capitol defenses and the first breach of the Capitol Building at the Senate Wing Door.

The video below is a brief summary, but if y'all want to be notified when the documentary goes live, follow me ...

00:00:58
September 08, 2023
J6 Documentary Released - 79 Minutes: Breach of the Capitol

At long last, the documentary I have been working on related to January 6th is live!

79 Minutes: Breach of the Capitol follows the timeline and sequence of events on January 6th between the initial violence at the edge of Capitol Grounds to the breach of the Capitol Building

Y'all can watch the full documentary for free:

placeholder
In the News - "Exposed: Investigation indicates ActBlue potentially ‘laundered’ fraudulent political donations" (Carolina Journal)

Carolina Journal political reporter Alex Baltzegar has a write-up on our investigation into political contribution laundering related to the ActBlue Democratic fundraising platform:
https://www.carolinajournal.com/exposed-investigation-indicates-actblue-potentially-laundered-fraudulent-political-donations/

In the News: "J6 Journalist Headed to Trial in Landmark Press Freedom Case"

I spoke with journalist Ken Silva for this article on my reporting as an independent journalist on January 6th, and the subsequent misdemeanor charges the DOJ brought against me:

"Horn provided examples of his earlier work, as well as reference letters, emails and other records supporting his claim to being a legitimate journalist—and not the pro-Trump activist that government has portrayed him as..."

https://headlineusa.com/exclusive-j6-journalist-press-freedom-case/

post photo preview
Court Documents Reveal Identity of Officer Who Shoved Trump Supporter Off Staircase

On January 6th, Derrick Vargo was severely injured when he was pushed off a ledge on the West side of the Capitol. Vargo was climbing up the outside of the railing with a flag as Capitol Police officers attempted to hold the landing mid-way up the North West staircase. Video shows Vargo turning around to retreat just before a Capitol Police officer in a blue motorcycle helmet and a black mask reaches out and pushes Vargo off the staircase. Vargo was carried off from the scene unresponsive.

Court documents released last month reveal the identity of the masked Capitol Police Officer as Bryant Williams. Although many of these facts were brought to my attention by a confidential source, they are verifiable via publicly available material. I am sharing this information because I believe in accountability.

United States v. RAMEY

Officer Williams was named as a victim in the government's case against Barry Bennet Ramey. Ramey was accused of spraying two officers including Williams with a chemical agent. Although Ramey was found guilty of charges including obstruction and violence, he was found not guilty of using a "deadly or dangerous weapon" in the commission of those crimes. Besides Officer Williams' testimony in the case describing his location and appearance, we also have a labeled screenshot from the government's post-trial brief:

From the United States's Post-Trial Brief, p.6

Following the Trail

Officer Williams is first seen at the foot of this staircase around 1:00 pm, shortly after rioters had overrun the police line at the perimeter of Capitol Grounds.

Still from video published by ABQ RAW showing Officer Williams at the foot of the NW staircase ~1 pm [1]

1:00 - 1:48 pm - foot of the NW staircase

As reinforcements arrive, the Capitol Police are able to re-stabilize a line across the lower plaza, between the two massive staircases leading up to the West Terrace. On January 6th, the staircases had been covered with scaffolding in preparation for the inauguration. Although there were officers like Williams guarding the entrance to the North West staircase, they were somewhat cut off from the more heavily armored officers in riot gear to the South, across the plaza, and to the North, across the lawn.

During this period, between 1:00 pm and 1:48 pm, the police are actually able to slowly push their line forward. They also begin deploying flashbangs into the crowd at approximately 1:20 pm (including setting a man on fire and all that fun stuff).

1:48 pm - foot of the NW staircase

Although the police have been able to more than hold their own on this side of the Capitol for nearly an hour, an incident at 1:48 pm involving Officer Williams is going to turn the tide against them. This is the first of a series of events on the North West staircase which will end up with the police abandoning the staircase, allowing rioters to outflank the main police line and breach undefended entrances like the Senate Wing Door, which will be the first entry into the actual Capitol Building.

The incident appears to start with an unidentified man in a grey hoodie referred to as "#lemongrey" by the "Sedition Hunters". As far as I can tell from the video, it is Officer Williams who initiates the scuffle by shoving #lemongrey as he turns to walk away. However, it quickly turns into a general assault and the police retreat up the staircase. Ramey was found guilty of assault for his use of a chemical spray at this time.

From the United States's Post-Trial Brief, p.6

1:48 pm - 2:02 pm - returning to duty on the NW staircase

According to Officer Williams' testimony in the Ramey trial, he was incapacitated by the chemical spray, and even collapsed due to the burning in his face. Before he had a chance to receive decontamination, he headed back over to defend the NW staircase (referred to as the "Senate stairs"). Williams also testified that "everything started getting kind of blurry", and that he is still suffering vision impairment from the incident.

Screenshots from Young Kim/RMG NEWS show Williams on the landing of the NW staircase

14:02 pm - Derrick Vargo

The police have retreated up to a landing on the middle of the staircase, and are attempting to hold the line. At this point, one Trump supporter named Derrick Vargo begins climbing up the outside of the railing on the staircase. According to Vargo, he just wanted to hang his flag up where people could see it (take that with as many grains of salt as you feel appropriate.) After officers attempt to strike, spray, and grab Vargo, he turns around and begins heading back towards the bottom of the staircase. Just then, the video shows Officer Williams stepping forward and pushing Vargo off the staircase. I encourage anyone interested to watch as many angles of video as they can before coming to their own conclusion.

screenshot from security camera

The aftermath

When Vargo hits the ground, there is an immediate reaction in the crowd below, as many witnessed the incident and believe the police officer is responsible. Shortly after Vargo is carried off on a bicycle rack used as an improvised stretcher, members of the crowd below the staircase begin throwing objects at the police on the landing. Under assault from two directions, these police retreat.

Although the police do briefly attempt to hold a line of fencing at the top of the staircase, they quickly scatter, giving the rioters unimpeded access to the West Terrace. Some quickly make their way over to the Senate Wing Door and break in through the windows, marking the first breach into the Capitol Building on January 6th.

One of the facts I find astonishing is that, despite the presence of Deputy Chief Eric Waldow on this staircase during this critical 20+ minute period, none of the heavily armored police on the plaza below appear to be sent to reinforce the beleaguered police on the NW staircase. Instead, the unit of armored Metropolitan Police which arrives during this period marches right past the foot of the staircase to join the main police line on the plaza.

For questions, comments, or correction, I am available for contact via Twitter or email

[1]

Read full Article
post photo preview
CONFIRMED: Undercover MPD Employee(s) Acted as Agent Provocateurs on January 6th

Since January 6th, many citizens have wondered if any of the numerous unarrested individuals caught on camera were federal agents/informants. I've been particularly curious about the Metropolitan Police "Undercover Employees" (MPD UCE) in the crowd. The first admission I'd seen by the federal government that any sort of undercover agents were present was in a criminal complaint filed against Fi Duong in June of 2021. Now, those specific undercover employees are back in the spotlight with a viral Twitter thread by another J6 defendant, William Pope. Pope included descriptions of several scenes from a video in which MPD UCEs join in crowd chants and encourage people to move towards the Capitol. In reviewing material for my own J6 case, I have been able to watch the video in question, and can confirm that Pope's claims regarding the MPD UCEs' actions/statements are largely accurate.

Undercover MPD referenced as "Officer 2" and "Officer 3" in the Pope Filing (source)

United States v. DUONG

On the morning of January 6th, a Virginia man named Fi Duong met an Metropolitan Police Undercover Employee near the Freedom Plaza in Washington D.C. Duong must have exchanged contact information with the MPD UCE, as he used the opportunity to introduce Duong to an undercover FBI agent. The FBI agent proceeded to inflitrate a sort of "gun club" which Duong was a member of. The agent was not able to entice Duong himself into any criminal activity (Duong was only charged with J6 related offenses), but the agent was able get another member of the group, Adam MacLaury, charged with firearm related offenses. However, the focus of this article is the actions of the MPD UCE referenced in these two paragraphs:

Excerpt from the Criminal Complaint/Statement of Facts against Fi Duong

 

MPD "Electronic Surveillance Unit"

As reported by Patricia Tolson in The Epoch Times, the Metropolitan Police Department had undercover/plainclothes employees in the crowd on January 6th to “document the actions of the demonstrators and MPD’s response to any civil disobedience or criminal activity.” It is my understanding that the video referenced in the Pope filing is one of the videos recorded by the Electronic Surveillance Unit, and kept as "sensitive" material in the January 6th evidence archive provided to defendants as Brady material. The video cannot currently be made public, as defendants are required to sign a protective order preventing certain "sensitive" or "highly sensitive" material from being disclosed.

The Pope Filing

In November 2022, William Pope included the following claims as part of a motion to compel the government to give him more access to discovery:

Below is an abbreviated description of the conversations and actions depicted in this undercover officer’s footage:
 
As three undercover MPD officers approach the NW corner of the Capitol groundsaround approximately 1:40 p.m., Officer 1 (filming) joins the crowd in chanting “drain the swamp.Near the NW walkway the three undercover officers see men running towards the Capitol. Officer 2, who is wearing black overalls, a black hoodie, a black bandana, and a red Trump beanie, remarks, “those guys are getting shot.” Shortly after this, Officer 2 says, “I’m going to follow this from a distance.As they walk forward, Officer 2 says, this is amazing!Officer 1 responds, Yeah, I’ve never seen anything like this.” Officer 2 then changes their direction and the three undercover officers head towards the Northwest Scaffolding. Near the scaffolding a man asks them, “is Trump still walking here?” Officer 2 remarks, “honestly I don’t think he can walk that far, let’s be honest, he’s long winded though that’s for sure.”
 
When protestors reach the top of the stairs and scaffolding, the three undercover officers move forward. Officer 3, a clean shaven white male who is wearing a blue jacket and grey beanie, yells “holy shit!” Officer 2 then reiterates his belief that someone will get shot. With awink and a nudge, Officer 3 asks Officer 2 if he wants to go up there too. Officer 2 smiles andsays, “I’ll be honest with you, kinda.” Officer 1 says “yeah” and taps them to move forward as Officer 2 laughs about it. When Officer 1 asks the other officers which way they want to go,Officer 2 suggests going up the stairs with protestors. Near the base of the stairs Officer 1 joins the crowd in chanting Whose house? Our house!
 
Officer 1 begins yelling at people in front of him to “Go, go, go!” As they climb bicycle racks, Officer 1 yells for the crowd to help him up, help him up! followed by “push him up, push him up!” Officer 1 also pushes others in front of him to get them to advance on the Capitol, and he yells “cmon, cmon, cmon, let’s go!” as those around him climb the bike racks and scaffolding. Needing help to get up, Officer 1 asks a nearby man to give him a boost. The man gives Officer 1 a lift up, and Offer 1 says “thanks bro.” As Officer 1 advances up the stairs, he continues to urge the crowd onward, yelling “cmon, go, go, go!,” followed shortly by “keep going, keep going!” These phrases are repeated as the undercover officer moves forward with the crowd. At one point, Officer 1 encounters a woman trying to go back down the steps and he discourages her from attempting it. Near the middle of the steps, Officer 1 encounters a man he recognizes wearing a blue jacket and what appears to be swim goggles and a white gargoyle mask with gold teeth. Officer 1 greets the manas “Tim,” and the plain clothes Tim responds, “what’s going on bro?”
 
This video clearly evidences undercover law enforcement officers urging the crowds to advance up the stairs and scaffolding towards the Capitol on January 6. The government may claim that incidents like this did not happen, but the facts show they did. Since the government cannot be trusted to disclose these facts, it becomes even more important that defense teams, including Pro Se defendants, be able to directly examine the evidence.

Although I have reviewed the full video which Pope is referencing, I will refrain from an in depth fact check or contextualization of each quote, since I am unclear whether that would be a violation of the protective order I have signed. I will note two "corrections":

  1. As the Epoch Times article notes, I'm not sure whether the members of the "Electronic Surveillance Unit" are techinically officers. The individual who encountered Fi Duong is referred to as an "Metropolitan Police Department Undercover Employees" in the Duong and MacLaury filings.
  2. I have been able to confirm that the individual referred to as "Tim" in the Pope filing is in fact J6 defendant Fi Duong, not another undercover agent

Conclusion

I believe the video referenced by Pope constitutes perhaps more real and confirmed evidence of federal agents/employees acting as "agent provocateur" than any other claims of the sort which have been made since January 6th, including Ray Epps. Unfortunately, we still seem to be a long ways from the public or even members of the media being able to review the evidence to determine what role the actions of the undercover government actors had in how January 6th played out.

Read full Article
post photo preview
NC GOP Sued over Convention E-Voting Debacle

Three delegates from the North Carolina Republican Party (NC GOP) convention in Greensboro last month have filed a lawsuit against the party over the electronic voting process/procedure.

The allegations in the lawsuit follow the same lines as the complaints I previously wrote on, centering around two issues: the failure to ensure that only delegates physically present on the floor could vote, and the failure to conduct an election for vice-chair of the party.

The plaintiffs are asking for the Wake Superior Court to declare that the NC GOP violated it's rules and order the party to conduct a special election.

The App

The rules for the convention stated that "delegates casting vote must be on the floor of the Convention at the time such vote is cast", but the custom app used for voting at the convention did not enforce this rule. The affidavits attached to the lawsuit contain evidence that both delegates and non-delegates were able to cast illegitimate votes using the app:

  • Alison Dunlap: a guest, who was able to use the app to vote from off the convention floor
  • Courtney Geels: delegate from Durham County, aware of votes cast from Wisconsin and Wilmington
  • Jay DeLancy: a guest, after seeing a delegate who was locked out after leaving the floor to use the restroom, DeLancy encouraged him to successfully use the app to vote from off the floor

As I noted previously, all these examples appear to be individuals whose purpose was to prove the flaws in the voting process.

There was an additional layer of security not mentioned in the lawsuit: the app required log-in credentials which were provided to delegates when they registered to the convention. I didn't see anything in the affidavits about how the non-delegate(s) who voted were able to bypass this security precaution.

Vice-chair election

The lawsuit also takes major issue with the lack of election for the vice-chair position. When the election for party chair went long, it was announced that there was not a quorum sufficient to continue with the vote for vice-chair and the session was adjourned. After the convention the challenger for vice-chair, Addul Ali, withdrew his candidacy, and it was decided that the incumbent Susan Mills was would continue for another 2-year term without an election.

The plaintiffs take issue with this appointment, alleging that it is a violation of the "Party's Plan of Organization and the State Convention Rules".


The full complaint and associated documents can be found on the e-Courts system: link.

The plaintiffs are represented by James R. Lawrence III and Adam Banks of Envisage Law.

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals